Geological Society Bicentenary_logo_rev_135.jpg

Working Party Matters


Membership | Terms of Reference | Task Allocation | Intranet | Geohazard Communication | Links |

 

Landslides & Slope Instability


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Subsidence & Collapse Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Seismic Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Flood Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Tsunami Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Volcanic Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Gas Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

 

Fault Reactivation Hazard


Engineering Geologists | Planners & Developers | Finance & Insurance | Member of the Public

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards

 

Landslide Introduction  | Landslide Types | Landslide Distribution  | Landslide Classification | Causes & Triggers | Rock Fall | Rock Topple | Rock Slide | Block Slide | Rock Flow | Rock Avalanche | Sturzstrom | Debris Fall | Debris Topple | Debris Slide | Block Slide | Debris Spread | Debris Flow | Soil Fall | Soil Topple | Soil Slide | Slab Slide | Soil Spread | Soil Flow |

 

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards: Landslide Classification

Many systems have been proposed for the classification of landslides, however, the most commonly adopted systems are those of Varnes (1978) and Hutchinson (1988). In 1991 a European classification was developed from the EPOCH (1991-1993) project (The Temporal Occurrence and Forecasting of Landslides in the European Community, Contract no. 90 0025). The EPOCH classification was simple and suitable for European conditions. Dikau et al (1996) produced a classification of landslide mechanisms, compatible with Hutchinson (1988) and EPOCH (1993).

The International Geotechnical Societies' UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory ( WP/ WLI) was formed for the International decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (1990 to 2000). The WP/ WLI (1990) report "A Suggested Method for Reporting a Landslide" uses Varnes' (1978) classification and reports that it is the most widely used. The World Road Association ( PIARC) report "Landslides: Techniques for Evaluating Hazard" (Escario et al., 1997) also presents a classification based on Varnes.

The landslide classification based on Varnes' (1978) system has two terms: the first term describes the material type and the second term describes the type of movement. The material types used  by the various schemes are Rock, Earth, Soil, Mud and Debris, being classified as follows:

Rock: is “a hard or firm mass that was intact and in its natural place before the initiation of movement”.

Soil: is “an aggregate of solid particles, generally of minerals and rocks, that either was transported or was formed by the weathering of rock in place. Gases or liquids filling the pores of the soil form part of the soil”.

Earth: “describes material in which 80% or more of the particles are smaller than 2mm, the upper limit of sand sized particles”.

Mud: “describes material in which 80% or more of the particles are smaller than 0.06mm, the upper limit of silt sized particles”.

Debris: “contains a significant proportion of coarse material; 20% to 80% of the particles are larger than 2mm, and the remainder are less than 2mm”.

The terms used should describe the displaced material in the landslide before it was displaced.

The types of movement describe how the landslide movement is distributed through the displaced mass.

The five kinematically distinct types of movement are described in the sequence fall, topple, slide, spread and flow.

Combining the two terms gives classifications such as Rock fall, Rock topple, Debris slide, Debris flow, Earth slide, Earth spread etc.

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards: Classification Schemes

Hutchinson, J. N. 1988. General Report: Morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. Proceedings, Fifth International Symposium on Landslides (Ed: Bonnard, C.), 1, 3-35. Rotterdam: Balkema

Varnes, D. J. 1978. Slope movement types and processes. In: Special Report 176: Landslides: Analysis and Control (Eds: Schuster, R. L. & Krizek, R. J.). Transportation and Road Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington D. C., 11-33.

EPOCH. 1993. The temporal occurrence and forecasting of landslides in the European community (Ed: Flageollet, J. C.). Contract No. 90 0025, 3 Volumes.

Dikau, R., Brunsden, D., Schrott, L. & M.-L. Ibsen (Eds.) 1996. Landslide Recognition. Identification, Movement and Causes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards: Multilingual Landslide Glossary

The following provides a summary of landslide terminology which should (for uniformity of practice) be adopted when classifying and describing a landslide. It has been based on Cruden & Varnes (1996) and the reader is recommended to refer to the original documents for a more detailed discussion, other terminology and further examples of landslide types and processes.

Terminology of landslides used in The Multilingual Landslide Glossary; profile and plan views. See below for explanation of numbers. After WP/WLI (1993).

(Image Source: Cooper, R.G. (2007) Mass Movements in Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 33, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 348 pp.)

1. Crown: The practically undisplaced material still in place and adjacent to the highest parts of the main scarp.

2. Main Scarp: A steep surface on the undisturbed ground at the upper edge of the landslide, caused by movement of the displaced material away from the undisturbed ground. It is the visible part if the surface of rupture.

3. Top: The highest point of contact between the displaced material and the main scarp.

4. Head: The upper parts of the landslide along the contact between the displaced material and the main scarp.

5. Minor Scarp: A steep surface on the displaced material of the landslide produced by differential movements within the displaced material.

6. Main Body: The part of the displaced material of the landslide that overlies the surface of rupture between the main scarp and the toe of the surface of rupture.

7. Foot: The portion of the landslide that has moved beyond the toe of the surface of rupture and overlies the original ground surface.

8. Tip: The point of the toe farthest from the top of the landslide.

9. Toe: The lower, usually curved margin of the displaced material of a landslide, it is the most distant from the main scarp.

10. Surface of Rupture: The surface which forms (or which has formed) the lower boundary of the displaced material below the original ground surface.

11. Toe of the Surface of Rupture: The intersection (usually buried) between the lower part of the surface of rupture of a landslide and the original ground surface.

12. Surface of Separation: The part of the original ground surface overlain by the foot of the landslide.

13. Displaced Material: Material displaced from its original position on the slope by movement in the landslide. It forms both the depleted mass and the accumulation.

14. Zone of Depletion: The area of the landslide within which the displaced material lies below the original ground surface.

15. Zone of Accumulation: The area of the landslide within which the displaced material lies above the original ground surface.

16. Depletion: The volume bounded by the main scarp, the depleted mass and the original ground surface.

17. Depleted Mass: The volume of the displaced material, which overlies the rupture surface but underlies the original ground surface.

18. Accumulation: The volume of the displaced material, which lies above the original ground surface.

19. Flank: The undisplaced material adjacent to the sides of the rupture surface. Compass directions are preferable in describing the flanks but if left and right are used, they refer to the flanks as viewed from the crown.

20. Original Ground Surface: The surface of the slope that existed before the landslide took place.

 

Landslide dimensions recommended in The Multilingual Landslide Glossary. See below for explanation of numbers. Based on WP/WLI (1993) and Cruden et al. (1994).

(Image Source: Cooper, R.G. (2007) Mass Movements in Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 33, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 348 pp.)

1. Width of the Displaced Mass: The width of the displaced mass, Wd, is the maximum breadth of the displaced mass perpendicular to the length of the displaced mass, Ld.

2. Width of the Rupture Surface: The width of the rupture surface, Wr, is the maximum width between the flanks of the landslide, perpendicular to the length of the rupture surface, Lr.

3. Total length: The total length, L, is the minimum from the tip of the landslide to the crown.

4. Length of the Displaced Mass: The length of the displaced mass, Ld, is the minimum distance from the tip to the top.

5. Length of the Rupture Surface: The length of the rupture surface, Lr, is the mimmum distance from the toe of the surface of rupture to the crown.

6. Depth of the Displaced Mass: the depth of the displaced mass, Dd, is the maximum depth of the displaced mass, measured perpendicular to the plane containing Wd and Ld.

7. Depth of the Rupture Surface: The depth of the rupture surface, Dr, is the maximum depth of the rupture surface below the original ground surface measured perpendicular to the plane containing Wr and Lr.

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards: Activity States and Styles

Classification of the states of activity of landslides used in the Multilingual Landslide Glossary: (1) active; (2) suspended; (3) re-activated; (5) dormant; (6) abandoned; (7) stabilized; (8) relict. State (4) inactive is divided into states (5)–(8). See below for explanation of states. After WP/WLI (1993).

(Image Source: Cooper, R.G. (2007) Mass Movements in Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 33, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 348 pp.)

Active: An active landslide is currently moving. In the example shown erosion at the toe causes a block to topple.

Suspended: A suspended landslide has moved within the last 12 months, but is not active at present. In the example shown local cracking can be seen in the crown of the topple.

Reactivated: A reactivated landslide is an active landslide which has been inactive. In the example shown another block topples and disturbs the previously displaced material.

Inactive: An inactive landslide has not moved within the last 12 months and can be divided into 4 states: Dormant, Abandoned, Stabilised and Relict.

Dormant: A dormant landslide is an inactive landslide which can be reactivated by its original causes or other causes. In the example shown the displaced mass begins to regain its tree cover and scarps are modified by weathering.

Abandoned: An abandoned landslide is an inactive landslide which is no longer affected by its original causes. In the example shown the fluvial deposition has protected the toe of the slope, the scarp begins to regain its tree cover.

Stabilised: A stabilised landslide is an inactive landslide which has been protected from its original causes by remedial measures. In the example shown a retaining wall protects the toe of the slope.

Relict: A relict landslide is an inactive landslide which developed under climatic or geomorphological conditions considerably different from those at present. In the example shown uniform tree cover has been established.

Distribution of the activity of landslides: (1) advancing; (2) retrogressive; (3) enlarging; (4) diminishing; (5) confined; (6) moving; (7) widening. See below for explanation of terms. After WP/WLI (1993).

(Image Source: Cooper, R.G. (2007) Mass Movements in Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 33, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 348 pp.)

Advancing: In an advancing landslide the rupture surface is extending in the direction of movement.

Retrogressive: In a retrogressive landslide the rupture surface is extending in the direction opposite to the movement of the displaced material.

Enlarging: in an enlarging landslide the rupture surface of the landslide is extending in two or more directions.

Diminishing: In a diminishing landslide the volume of displaced material is decreasing.

Confined: In a confined landslide there is a scarp but no rupture surface visible at the foot of the displaced mass.

Moving: In a moving landslide the displaced material continues to move without any visible change in the rupture surface and the volume of the displaced material.

Widening: In a widening landslide the rupture surface is extending into one or both flanks of the landslide.

Styles of landslide activity: (1) complex; (2) composite; (3) successive; (4) single; (5) multiple. See below for explanation of terms. After WP/WLI (1993).

(Image Source: Cooper, R.G. (2007) Mass Movements in Great Britain, Geological Conservation Review Series, No. 33, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 348 pp.)

Complex: A complex landslide exhibits at least two types of movement (falling, toppling, sliding, spreading and flowing) in sequence. In the example shown a gneiss and a pegmatite vein toppled with valley incision. Alluvial deposits fill the valley bottom. After weathering had weakened the toppled material some of the displaced mass slid further downslope.

Composite: A composite landslide exhibits at least two types of movement simultaneously in different parts of the displacing mass. In the example shown the limestones have slid on the underlying shales causing toppling below the toe of the slide rupture surface.

Successive: A successive landslide is the same type as a nearby, earlier landslide, but does not share displaced material or rupture surface with it. In the example shown the later slide AB is the same type as CD but does not share displaced material or a rupture surface with it.

Single: A single landslide is a single movement of displaced material.

Multiple: A multiple landslide shows repeated development of the same type of movement.

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards: Velocity Classification

The figure below shows the velocity scale proposed by Cruden & Varnes (1996) which rationalises previous scales. The term “creep” has been omitted due to the many definitions and interpretations in the literature.

(Image Source: Landslide Risk Management Concepts and Guidelines, Australian Geomechanics Society, Sub-Committee on Landslide Risk Management http://www.australiangeomechanics.org/LRM.pdf)

Landslide & Slope Instability Geohazards:

 

Landslides: References Cited 

Landslide Introduction  | Landslide Types | Landslide Distribution  | Landslide Classification | Causes & Triggers | Rock Fall | Rock Topple | Rock Slide | Block Slide | Rock Flow | Rock Avalanche | Sturzstrom | Debris Fall | Debris Topple | Debris Slide | Block Slide | Debris Spread | Debris Flow | Soil Fall | Soil Topple | Soil Slide | Slab Slide | Soil Spread | Soil Flow |


Engineering Group Working Party on Geological Hazards